Quickly become better at drawing—without burning out—by using my workbook.
reader asked the following question:
“Your process for drawing the head model Morpho study
It’s the one in profile.
Why do you start with the outline of the nose, then the small contours around the eye, etc.?
It appeals to me, but I don’t think I’ve seen it taught that way. Rather, I think I’ve more often seen advice to start with the big shapes like head, jaw, etc.”
I think they are referring to this one (click on the image to go through the drawing steps):
It is a good question.
Usually, when you draw a skull-like structure like this, you draw a sphere, put down a drop line along the center of the face, and draw the eye line, and you construct from there: eyebrows at one-third from the top, eyes halfway, nose two-thirds down, mouth one third down from the space underneath the nose, eyes one eye apart, a half eye to either side, the ears going from the eye line to the nose line.
You may even go as far as using the Reilly method, drawing rhythm lines on the head to help place facial features.
These are good methods for constructing heads; I don’t suggest abandoning them. Your eye notices when something is off, especially in the head and hands, things we see often. Heads of women and children are even harder to get right.
So why freehand draw? Why eyeball it? Several reasons:
He draws directly with pen or brush, without an underdrawing. He had a mental image of the underlying forms, so it was like he had made an underdrawing. His drawings are expressive and lively and look amazing, and I wanted to learn to do that. He freehand-draws in the details directly without first constructing the big shapes.
It is useful to see the big forms in your head and to draw accordingly. You can be more playful that way and change the big forms instantly in your head.
Freehand drawing, then measuring, and then correcting is a great way to discover and correct your visual prejudices.
A person is about 7.5 heads high. If we make the form fewer heads high, the person looks more like a child. If we instead make the figures 8, 9, or even ten heads high, they will look like a mythical person.
If you measure and construct beforehand, you’re stuck with the “right” proportions. There are no “right” proportions. We’re all different. As an artist, it is better to develop a sense of where the line would look nice and where it feels right. Playing with proportion becomes another tool in your artistic tool chest.
A caveat: don’t listen to advice from someone who doesn’t know your goals. That includes me, too. I don’t know what your artistic goals are. All I can present is what worked for me, but something else might work better for you! You’ll know when that is the case: the advice will feel wrong, although you can’t explain why initially. With time, you’ll understand. I had that with the art academy I attended: they were training me to be a kind of artist I didn’t want to be. Teachers are not always right, especially when they don’t know your goals. What works for them might not work for you, but at the same time, all a teacher can do is present what works for them.
Also, there are no rules. A teacher will ask you to draw one way, and another will ask you to draw another way. It’s not that you have to draw like that for the rest of your life! Often, the teacher wants to show you something. That’s why you need to work with different teachers. They will seem to contradict each other, but really, they are not. They are just presenting what worked for them.
Try out the different options. I love freehand drawing a lot and enjoy trying to make a drawing work after I make a mistake, but constructing the big forms first might be the thing for you. Freehand drawing can train you to become a better artist overall, as you become better at getting lines in the right spot in one go without needing an underlying construction drawing, and it gives you the freedom to come up with more dynamic, less stiff, less composed drawings.
If you have a question I can answer, please don’t hesitate to ask!